AIforWPSites

WordPress Community Shaken as Automattic Suspends Key Services Amid WP Engine Lawsuit

Citing ongoing legal tensions with hosting provider WP Engine, Automattic has announced the suspension of several key free services on WordPress.org. This decision, made by founder Matt Mullenweg, is expected to disrupt workflows for developers and users alike during a critical time for the community.

Key Takeaways

  • Automattic suspends new account registrations, plugin and theme submissions, and more.
  • The suspension is a response to a legal battle with WP Engine.
  • The conflict escalated after Automattic forked the Advanced Custom Fields plugin.
  • A federal judge has intervened, ordering Automattic to reverse certain actions.

Background of the Conflict

The relationship between Automattic and WP Engine has been strained for years, but tensions escalated significantly in September 2024. During the WordCamp conference, Mullenweg publicly criticized WP Engine, calling it a "cancer" within the WordPress community. This public denouncement set the stage for a series of contentious events.

In October, Automattic forked the Advanced Custom Fields (ACF) plugin, which allows developers to add custom fields to WordPress edit screens. This move was seen as a direct challenge to WP Engine, which had acquired ACF in 2019. Automattic’s new version, Secure Custom Fields, stripped away commercial features, leading WP Engine to label the action a "hostile takeover."

Legal Developments

The dispute quickly transitioned into the legal arena, with WP Engine suing Automattic for alleged anticompetitive behavior. Court documents revealed that Automattic demanded an 8% revenue share from WP Engine or equivalent staffing contributions to regain access to WordPress.org resources. This demand, along with IP blocking and other restrictions, formed the basis of WP Engine’s legal claims.

In December, a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction against Automattic, ordering the company to reverse several actions that had disrupted WP Engine’s operations. Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín criticized Automattic for marginalizing WP Engine within the WordPress ecosystem and mandated the restoration of WP Engine’s access to WordPress.org resources.

Community Reactions

The suspension of services has sparked frustration within the WordPress community. Developers and users rely on these services for various activities, and the halt is likely to delay projects and disrupt workflows. Mullenweg’s announcement also highlighted the personal toll of the legal battle, as he noted that much of his time is consumed by defending against WP Engine’s legal actions.

Critics of Automattic’s control over WordPress.org argue that it creates a conflict of interest, potentially stifling competition. The forking of the ACF plugin has raised concerns about the future of third-party development within the WordPress ecosystem. WP Engine has framed the conflict as a test of WordPress’s commitment to open-source principles, warning that Mullenweg’s actions could irreparably harm the community.

Looking Ahead

As the legal battle continues, the WordPress community is left grappling with the implications of this conflict. The situation has fueled calls for reforms to WordPress.org’s governance, with some advocating for more independent oversight to ensure fair competition and transparency.

While Automattic maintains that its actions are aimed at enhancing platform security, the scrutiny surrounding its dual role as a commercial entity and steward of open-source WordPress is intensifying. The outcome of this conflict could have lasting effects on the future of WordPress and its community.

Sources

  • WordPress.org Suspends Key Free Services, Blames WP Engine Lawsuit – WinBuzzer, WinBuzzer.

Copyright © 2025 · Dynamik-Gen on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}